In a major setback for the future of space operations, NASA has pulled the plug on its visionary $2 billion satellite refueling project aka OSAM-1. The decision comes amidst blistering criticism of the program’s prime contractor, Maxar, with the agency’s watchdog labeling their performance “poor.”
As per Reuters, the now-canceled OSAM-1 (On-orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing 1) represented a bold ambition to extend the life of aging satellites through in-orbit servicing and refueling. For the same reason, almost a decade of effort has been brought to a grinding halt.
Satellite refueling cost overruns, missed deadlines and lost partners
NASA‘s statement bluntly blames the project’s demise on mounting technical hurdles, ballooning expenses, and ever-shifting timelines. It seems the final nail in the coffin was a broader trend away from refueling satellites not specifically designed for such a process. This led to a need for more interested partners for NASA.
This announcement has a significant impact on NASA’s project management reputation. As per a CNBC report, a spokesperson for the agency admitted that 450 personnel were assigned to OSAM-1, which is disappointing. Despite the abrupt halt, the agency has promised to support this workforce through the fiscal year.
Contractor under the microscope
Maxar Space Systems, the project’s lead contractor, faces a hard rebuke from NASA. “We are disappointed,” their spokesperson admits, attempting a diplomatic tone, even as NASA lays the blame squarely at their feet.
Additionally, the restructuring of Maxar into intelligence and spacecraft manufacturing divisions may have contributed to the issues. In 2015, the creators first envisioned OSAM-1. It had the ambitious aim of extending the operational lifespan of the Landsat 7 satellite by servicing it. However, the project has fallen years behind schedule and exceeded its initial cost estimates by a significant margin.
Spotlight on NASA’s management
Perhaps most damning is the October report by NASA’s Inspector General. The findings paint a picture of “Maxar underestimating the scope” and lacking the technical chops to meet NASA’s exacting demands. However, in a particularly harsh assessment, the report even points the finger at NASA’s own Goddard Center. It accuses them of mishandling key aspects of the project. Accusations of exceeding budgets, missing launch dates, and misplaced priorities fly thick and fast in the official report.
The abrupt end of OSAM-1 raises questions about the private sector’s readiness to handle these complex space initiatives.
While companies like Northrop Grumman have found success with satellite life-extension missions, in-orbit refueling may be a more difficult challenge than the industry anticipated.
Scan WeChat to give rewards
Scan Alipay and reward
